<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Untitled Title Page &#187; Whining</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theuntitledtitlepage.com/tag/whining/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theuntitledtitlepage.com</link>
	<description>Follow our lives, one page at a time...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 22:46:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>SOOC vs. edits</title>
		<link>http://theuntitledtitlepage.com/2009/06/03/sooc-vs-edits/</link>
		<comments>http://theuntitledtitlepage.com/2009/06/03/sooc-vs-edits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 22:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Emily</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Musings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whining]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theuntitledtitlepage.com/?p=373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>SOOC is what cool people use to refer to pictures that are &#8220;straight out of camera&#8221; or unedited. (Hehe&#8230; just kidding about the cool people part, since I use the term and therefore negate that whole cool people thing.)</p>
<p>I have a bit a of an issue with editing pictures. Or a quandry, I guess. Here&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SOOC is what cool people use to refer to pictures that are &#8220;straight out of camera&#8221; or unedited. (Hehe&#8230; just kidding about the cool people part, since I use the term and therefore negate that whole cool people thing.)</p>
<p>I have a bit a of an issue with editing pictures. Or a quandry, I guess. Here&#8217;s the thing: I really like photography, and I feel like the fact that a lot of people edit their pictures gives an unrealistic expectation of what pictures can look like. Sometimes I&#8217;ll see some photos a photographer or whoever has put on their blog and I think &#8220;Wow, that&#8217;s amazing&#8230; I wish I could take pictures with such fantastic color.&#8221; And then I realize that they were probably photoshopped. HMM.</p>
<p>Really, it&#8217;s that I have neither the time nor ability to edit my pictures, and I&#8217;m jealous that because of this my photos might look not as good as other people&#8217;s. If my pictures aren&#8217;t as good because of my lack of photography talent, that&#8217;s fine (and true), but it seems a little silly that half of the talent needed for good photography nowadays is ability to photoshop well. Doesn&#8217;t that seem a little unfair?</p>
<p><a href="http://thepioneerwoman.com/photography/2009/01/orange-sunrise/">This is a prime example</a> of what I&#8217;m talking about. You see the edited picture and think &#8220;Wow, what amazing color! I would love to get a shot like that.&#8221; And then you look at the original and realize that you have, in fact, taken that same picture about 15 times, you just haven&#8217;t edited it. It feels almost like a lie when you edit pictures to that extreme, you know? (I&#8217;m not trying to be nasty about PW in particular, by the way&#8230; this is just an example. But didn&#8217;t she win some award for website photography? Seems to me like that&#8217;s different than pure photography.) I totally understand editing to fix up details, correct exposure, or smooth out someone&#8217;s acne or little things like that. But to change major elements of a photo seems weird to me.</p>
<p>This is, of course, the same issue in fashion photography how the editing of pictures gives people unrealistic expectations of beauty and what real people look like. But that&#8217;s another, and larger, issue.</p>
<p>Do you know what I&#8217;m talking about? I do actually sometimes edit pictures, but that&#8217;s only because I tend to take them a little underexposed and so I need to lighten them so that you can see them well. (Also because it&#8217;s often grey here, which now is changing as the season progresses.) So I&#8217;m not opposed to editing pictures, but I just see it as a different skill than photography. Where do those lines cross? And really, like I said, I&#8217;m probably just jealous that my pictures don&#8217;t look so amazing. Hehe.</p>
<p>Okay, got that off my chest. I feel better now.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">To counteract all the above complaining, here&#8217;s some happiness:<img class="aligncenter" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3655/3592893783_8ea53ea52d.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>Ah! Sleeping baby! I take a lot of pictures of her sleeping. I mean, look at those pink lips, rosy cheeks, soft hands, and little eyelashes. Oh my oh my.</p>
<p>You&#8217;d think that these were the same day as any previous shot I&#8217;ve taken and posted of her sleeping, but no. I just always nurse her on this pillow and so she tends to fall asleep on it. And it&#8217;s been so warm that I dress her in just a onesie most of the time. I can&#8217;t stop taking these sleeping pictures, though. Too sweet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://theuntitledtitlepage.com/2009/06/03/sooc-vs-edits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
